Upgrading to an ultra high-definition television might not be as worthwhile as many consumers think, according to new research from the University of Cambridge. Scientists have found that the human eye can only process a limited amount of detail, meaning that for most people and living room setups, the benefits of 4K or 8K resolution are minimal.
Standard HD displays contain around 920,000 pixels, while full HD increases that number to about two million, and quad HD reaches nearly 3.7 million. High-end models go even further — 4K screens feature approximately 8.3 million pixels, and 8K versions exceed 33 million. In theory, more pixels should produce a sharper image. However, researchers say the human eye struggles to perceive any meaningful improvement once resolution surpasses a certain threshold.
In tests carried out by Cambridge’s Department of Computer Science and Technology in collaboration with Meta Reality Labs, scientists concluded that at a typical viewing distance of 2.5 metres — roughly the space between a sofa and TV in an average UK living room — a 44-inch 4K or 8K television would appear no clearer than a lower-resolution quad HD model of the same size.
The findings suggest consumers may be paying extra for pixels they cannot actually see, while also consuming more electricity to power the higher-resolution display.
Dr. Maliha Ashraf, one of the study’s authors, said the results have broader implications for the tech industry: “As engineers push for ever higher resolutions in smartphones, virtual reality, and augmented reality, it’s important to understand where additional improvements stop making a visible difference.”
The research, published in Nature Communications, measured how many pixels can fit within a single degree of a person’s field of vision. Previous studies estimated that humans can detect around 60 pixels per degree, but the new data found slightly higher limits — 94 pixels per degree for black-and-white images, 89 for red and green, and just 53 for yellow and violet.
Professor Rafal Mantiuk, who led the study, explained that our brains are less capable of distinguishing fine detail in colour: “We simply don’t process colour resolution as precisely as brightness.”
Eighteen participants, with an average age of 25, took part in the experiments. They viewed images while seated with their heads stabilised, and researchers adjusted the distance between their eyes and the display. The results showed that any advantage of 8K resolution disappears when the viewer sits farther than 1.3 times the height of the screen.
For example, with a 44-inch television standing about 25 inches tall, viewers would need to sit within roughly 85 centimetres — less than three feet — to perceive any added sharpness from 8K.
“If a display packs in more pixels than your eyes can resolve, it’s simply less efficient,” Mantiuk said. “It drives up costs, power consumption, and processing requirements without providing any visual benefit.”
thetechtrident.com 